There's a Biomedical Mutual Organization (BMO) taking shape.
I suspect William Baines and Seth Roberts would agree.
It may still be in the start-up stages, but it's building momentum as we speak.
I envision, perceive, and actively participate in (thankfully and luckily) an intriguing and innovative Ancestral Fitness Epistemocracy (AFE) that is coalescing on the periphery in the Blogosphere.
I suspect Nassim Taleb would agree.
It's an artistic, practical, and real-world bricolage of searching and acting--a meritage for taking Theory to Practice--and it's unveiling and uncovering wisdom in the clinical practice of leading lives where we thrive.
Carlos Rizo--mi amigo de Innovation Cell--and I started tinkering with thinkering awhile back, behind the scenes, and since then, some of our concepts, ideas, and hypotheses have come to fruition interestingly, bubbling up in various forms, such as my presentation on Nutritional Bricolage at BIL:PIL a few weeks ago.
So the initial inertia is not insurmountable and the ongoing momentum is building: we just need to ensure that we capture it and channel this positive energy effectively so that we blaze these new frontiers and pathbreaking trails in a manner that allows everyone to benefit from our trial-and-error collectivities.
Remember: We can learn by grace or by hard knocks--let's choose grace.
The Ancestral Fitness Epistemocracy (AFE), as a highly-diversified, graceful community of self-experimenting deductivists connected through the power of the Web, acts as a self-funded biotechnology 'company': various bloggers are cataloguing--as Sextus Empiricus and members of the Empiric School of Medicine did--their self-experimentation hypotheses, observations, results, and conclusions and then sharing them openly and honestly with the world.
With falsification and the history of science, the history of medicine in mind, we must not forget the Black Swan reality that PubMed is an Anthology of Mythologies. Research studies, of all shapes and sizes, suffer from various biases, statistical limits, errors, and misinterpretations, but they do serve as good narratives--abstracts are like short-stories--for fueling thought-experiments that could potentially motivate self-experiments. The statistics of individuals--n=1--trumps the scant observation of many because all that really matters is what works, what doesn't work, and what else is possible in our own specific cases. Different ancestral lineages and genetic backgrounds, biochemical individuality (*see Roger Williams, hat tip to Dave Lull), aesthetic preferences, cultural nuances, religious traditions, sensory perceptions, etc. all point to the far-reaching implications of individuality that we must respect, at some point, and then operationalize by systemically exposing ourselves to the envelope of serendipity. In this context, it takes m=1 my-thologizing to surmount inertia--to serve as venture capital--and then it takes Barbell-framed n=1 self-experimenting to gather, maintain, and build momentum throughout a Patient of One clinical trial. It's the physics of thinkering, Richard Feynman style, of course.
So what does this thinkering process look like in practice?
Well, I conduct--as Einstein did--thought-experiments as I interact with the various textures of this world in my local ecology, and these active reflections--like a stream of consciousness--often go something like this: A cell membrane--what I call the epigenetic Cell MemBRAIN--is composed of a phosphoLIPID bilayer, and cholesterol is embedded in this bilayer as an integral structural component that contributes mightily to membrane fluidity and many other things. In fact, without phospholipids, life would not be possible as we experience it today because phospholipids permit the formation of a micelle, an entity which separates the contents of the inside of a cell from the outside of the cell, allowing a cell to control its internal environment through mechanisms like selective permeability, despite fluctuations and changes in the external ecology. Cholesterol and (good) lipids don't seem harmful to me in that context; on the contrary, they seem quite critical and functional. What else do I know about cell composition in relation to lipids? Well, nerve cells, like the ones in my brain that intake, process, and signal vital information throughout my body, are composed primarily of lipids. That's interesting: our brains are mainly made of lipids. And what do neurons do? They conduct electrical signals. How do those electrical signals move? They jump between Nodes of Ranvier along the neuron's axon, speeding the conduction of electricity immensely, thanks to electrically-insulating myelin sheaths. Myelin sheaths are almost entirely (~80%) made of lipids, and many neurodegenerative diseases like Multiple Sclerosis are linked to degradation of the myelin sheath--that means the erosion of lipid structures in nerve cells. Myelin repair (*see the Myelin Repair Foundation, thanks to the awesome Justine Lam who wore Vibrams to BIL:PIL and worked on the Ron Paul campaign) is a ripe area of research right now, but what causes the breakdown of myelin sheaths in the first place? Could it be diets deficient in saturated animal and omega-3 lipids? That seems plausible given that we have ostracized lipids in modern day (to our own peril, that is) in favor of inflammation-causing 'complex' carbohydrates. What else do I know about lipids? Well, I know that they lubricate surfaces; they facilitate fluid flow through a vessel. Coronary arteries are vessels with fluid (blood) flowing through them. If I were an engineer or physicist studying fluid dynamics in these vessels, I suspect I might conclude that the right soluble lipids would support blood flow through arteries and veins, thus preventing strokes and heart disease. That could be important to cardiology--another specialty of medical mythology. And, finally, I remember studying the formation, absorption, and transportation of vitamins and hormones, only to learn that lipids (and cholesterol) play central roles in orchestrating the use of these molecules in our physiologies. Where are the lipids in Gatorade? All those vitamins sans lipids does not make sense to me. Lean protein never made sense to me. That seems hard on the kidneys, which led to the "Atkins folly". Maybe we should design multivitamins and other supplements based upon the liver contents of healthy, active, wild animals that we evolved to consume? Animal livers could have served as our ancestral 'multivitamins' for many years. Well, that's enough for now, I must pull my head out of the clouds.
It's time to test hyperlipidity directly, on myself, just to see what happens. That makes sense to me. Let's see if I can falsify the conjectures generated by my thought-experiments.
So, I conduct these types of thought-experiments 'randomly'. In fact, this is how I built my novel model for the intricate interaction between antibiotics and intestinal-tract microflora: Clostridium difficile is a weed inside your digestive tract. Research studies, physiological concepts, and other scientific principles served as data points and reference frames for my thinking about 'good' and 'bad' bacteria, which compelled me to tinker through nutritional bricolage with good bacteria in my diet via fermented foods as a proactive, preventive approach to embracing a probiotic culture in modern medicine in hopes of averting the antibiotic-resistance slide that current healthcare practices drive. Later, I re-edited this model when I learned that many bad bacteria survive on sugars (fructose, in particular), and I responded by entering Fructose Detox to explore further how best to optimize my gastrointestinal health. I also added high-lipid FAGE, raw cheese, kombucha, apple cider vinegar, and other good bacteria items into my energy intake patterns, and I submitted my hypothesis to a running, practical and grounded real-world empirical test. The best parts: this test is cheap--I didn't have to write a grant or convince an organization for funding--is embedded naturally within my life experiences--I eat food and consume beverages already, regardless--and is enjoyable to conduct--I get to try new foods as a bricoleur / connoisseur. It also captures and benefits from the placebo effect--I serve as an active agent in determining my own health state: agency is a beautiful thing.
So I have thinkered my way through each day for awhile now, continuing to read, research, reflect, write, and re-edit/re-design my tentative, working 'story system' on the fly, only to recently realize, after traversing this fractal 'm=1/n=1' philosophy path iteratively, spontaneously, and organically for quite some time, that the Ancestral Fitness Epistemocracy (AFE) is a real, active, and rapidly evolving and growing Biomedical Mutual Organization (BMO), uniting Nassim Taleb's vision of an epistemocracy forming in the Blogosphere with William Bains' vision of n=1 clinical trials in biotechnology via Seth Roberts-inspired self-experimentation.
Just take a look (click) around the Web; we have all the leadership pieces in place (Note: This is only a partial list of the exemplary self-experimenters in this expanding health space):
We have our MDs, our PhDs, and our CDs (Doctorate of Curiosity): William Davis, Michael Eades, Kurt Harris, Doug McGuff, Dr. T, Dr. B G, Art Ayers, Loren Cordain, Stephan Guyenet, Aaron Blaisdell, Art DeVany, Seth Roberts, Mark Sisson, Richard Nikoley, Keith Norris, Matt Metzgar, KetoWarrior, Don Matesz, Jimmy Moore, Tom Naughton, Jeff Erno, Robb Wolf, Bryce, Skyler Tanner, Peter, Brian Geremia, Marc, Zach, etc.
And then there's me; just sitting here, trying to make sense of this online conversation melody.
It's all in the spirit of ancestral mimicry.
I see an AFE.
I see a new approach to biotechnology.
But maybe that's just me.
To good health,
Brent
Beautiful. Simply beautiful. Great story!
ReplyDeleteBrent,
ReplyDeleteThanks for bestowing on The Paleo Garden a CD. With the help of some of the great writing you've done over the last few days, I put together a post that I think contributes to a point that you recently made.
Cheers and Parkour!
Best Regards,
Zach
Thanks, Aaron!
ReplyDelete&
Thanks, Zach!
Nice work buddy--you captured my intent perfectly:
"I assumed that Brent was referring to chronic catabolism brought on hormonally through bad diet (e.g., Standard American Diet of high carbs and sugar) and chronic cardio (e.g., marathons, jogging). Because Brent, like many others in our evolutionary community, appreciates the merits of intermittent fasting, he inherently endorses acute catabolism. So, when he writes ”catabolism-avoidance” it should not be assumed that you should always be afraid of dipping into the catabolic state."
http://www.thepaleogarden.com/2009/11/13/vocab-lesson-catabolic-state/
It's very important to be careful about language and meaning--we learned this acutely from the 'fat' terminology problems in linguistic anthropology--so I really appreciate your excellent essay to bring appropriate precision and clarification to the term 'catabolism avoidance'--you read between the lines just right.
I went back and revised my essay, linking to your essay too.
Much appreciated--keep up the great work!
Cheers,
Brent
Brent,
ReplyDeleteYes, likewise, I'm trying to by your example use the words "fat" and "lipid" in the correct context, because as you note when one does it really helps put cracks in the antiquated/incorrect/hurtful low-fat dogma.
Best Regards,
Zach
Excellent comments, as usual for this blog. A point of clarification, fat = lipids that are solid, oil = lipids that are liquid (don't know if there is a term for vaporized lipids as they are probably quite rare). But yes, "fat" the solid lipid unfortunately got coopted to mean "overweight", thus dirtying the once pure term. C'est la vie.
ReplyDeleteAnd could we coin the term of tinkering with links to related ideas "linkering"? It's all a part of thinkering. ;-)
Thanks, Aaron.
ReplyDeleteAgreed.
We eat most of our saturated animal lipids in the solid 'fat' form, as a result of temperatures, and then they become 'oil' in our blood as soluble lubricants that aid our physiologies in so many ways.
Omega 3's are lipids that we consume as 'oils'.
Good additions.
Let it be known: 'Linkering' has been coined!
Linkering is sure contributing to the developing 'Global (Information) Brain' each and every day.
Dave Lull excels at Linkering--I would bet on him against any other information scientists/philosophers in a Linkering Olympics! lol
Parkour!
Best,
Brent
It looks like 'linker' is a valuable term in many domains:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=active&q=define%3A+linker&btnG=Search
(hat tip to Dave Lull)
It looks like a diverse spread of taking fragments and connecting them in ways where the resulting whole is more than the sum of the fragmented parts.
Linkering then takes it to another level of connectivity ...
Great work as always, Brent; love the term "thinkering"! And, hey - thanks for including me with such an erudite crowd. But really, I am nothing more than a bottom-feeding, "bricoleur"; absorbing what is useful,discarding what is not. Thanks for constructing/organizing the mental toolbox for all these n=1,m=1 ideas. BTW, Justine Lam sounds like my kind of gal. Rockin' the Vibrams at an academic conference? You go girl!
ReplyDeleteThanks, Keith.
ReplyDeleteDefinitely: Vibrams + EvoFit + Ron Paul = Awesome
That's a good n=1/m=1 portfolio sliver to live by.
Cheers to 'bottom-feeding' bricolage: test, falsify, discard, repeat.
Best,
Brent
Atkins is far more Primal then you care to give credit. With the information he had to work with inthe 5o/60/70s, he was a head of his time yet many including Devany bash him instead of seeing that he broke ground none of you would have been able to thread without him. DeVany even hit a new low blow that cause me to cancell my subscription to his site. You all sit on his shoulders as he sat on the shoulders before him.
ReplyDeleteIn regards to the "Atkins Folly", I did not refer to Atkins himself but rather to the social movement a few years back. Atkins was ahead of his time as a person. My ancestor was researching before Atkins as well. It's all just ancestral mimicry. All my reference intended to capture was the protein-rich products that emerged in the name of Atkins, like bars, soy protein foods, etc. that were low in fat and low-carb. Our kidneys need lipids to handle proteins. That's all.
ReplyDelete