
(Above: Dr. Doug McGuff, M.D. discusses his perceptive thoughts on health)
Better maps do exist.
Body by Science is one such map, written by two epistemocrats: Dr. McGuff and John Little.
Super-slow and highly-intense, that's the energy expenditure coupling and underlying spirit you should be thinkering with when you decide to self-experiment with the Body by Science epistemocratic map for health decision making. That, and a real foods ancestral diet, of course. Like Mark Sisson's Primal Blueprint, which I reviewed recently, Body by Science is born out of experience, from the bottom-up, emerging from John Little and Dr. McGuff scouring the evidence-based literature--the PubMed Anthology as one primary source of medical mythologies--and then testing these conjectures on real people, under real-world conditions: that's ecologically intelligent clinical health science in practice. Human beings are the best animal models for studying human physiology (when safe and appropriate for testing).
My favorite animal model is my own body.
I am a Patient of One, so I approach my health and fitness with a n=1 frame-of-mind. As Dr. McGuff suggests, I attempt to send proper signals to my body to stimulate desired physiological responses and epigenetic adaptations. When it comes to n=1 clinical trials with exercise (energy expenditure, generally), fractally randomized bouts of high intensity / low-duration work provides an efficient and effective hormonal 'kick' for me.
Since this essay is an attempt at a quasi-book-review reflection, and I try not to reveal too much of the actual contents of a book when I review it (hoping folks will actually go read the book instead), I have to say that any health and fitness book that references Nassim Taleb's Fooled by Randomness, as Body by Science (BBS) does, moves up the ranks quickly in my book. Nassim's work is a good heuristic for sorting through information sources. When it comes to BBS, Jeff Erno (@ernoj) is the epistemocrat you want to follow to learn more about and observe applications of the BBS principles regularly. He's even working on a 'Workout Tracker' to help folks organize their experimental efforts in this domain. Personally, I approach my self-experiments with energy expenditure from the portfolio perspective, and I default to Barbell diversification whenever possible. Barbell diversification relies on the formation of a stable foundational platform, the 'tried-and-true' investments that make up 80-90% of your portfolio, upon which you can engage in diversified trial-and-error with novel options (10-20%). Awhile ago, BBS started as a novel option for me. I have been working for some time now to incorporate more and more of the BBS spirit into my trips to the gym. I've started doing more ultra-slow body-weight dips; I've started doing upside-down pushups at super-slow rates, and then again at my fastest pace (I've done the same with leg presses, etc.); essentially, I've been tinkering here and there, which means that I have been diversifying my energy expenditure portfolio nicely. Right now, I feel as if BBS is becoming part of my 'tried-and-true' platform, as a work-in-progress component of my hybridized base. It's my 'm=1/n=1' application of Joseph Campbell's The Hero with a Thousand Faces: the practice of hybridizing role-models, mentors, and heroes in our lives to mimic and learn from. When it comes to exercise, as a student of fitness who wants to feel good, I like to hybridize Dr. McGuff's wonderful insights with Keith Norris' excellent functional power quest (The Power Zone) and Mark Sisson's awesome Primal Laws--it's 'The Hero with Three Faces' that I am primarily thinkering with currently. To me, it appears that each of these bricoleurs fits Campbell's monomyth description of the journey that heroes progress through in mythologies:
Campbell explores the theory that important myths from around the world which have survived for thousands of years all share a fundamental structure, which Campbell called the monomyth. In a well-known quote from the introduction to The Hero with a Thousand Faces, Campbell summarized the monomyth: “A hero ventures forth from the world of common day into a region of supernatural wonder: fabulous forces are there encountered and a decisive victory is won: the hero comes back from this mysterious adventure with the power to bestow boons on his fellow man.” In laying out the monomyth, Campbell describes a number of stages or steps along this journey. The hero starts in the ordinary world, and receives a call to enter an unusual world of strange powers and events (a call to adventure). If the hero accepts the call to enter this strange world, the hero must face tasks and trials (a road of trials), and may have to face these trials alone, or may have assistance. At its most intense, the hero must survive a severe challenge, often with help earned along the journey. If the hero survives, the hero may achieve a great gift (the goal or "boon"), which often results in the discovery of important self-knowledge. The hero must then decide whether to return with this boon (the return to the ordinary world), often facing challenges on the return journey. If the hero is successful in returning, the boon or gift may be used to improve the world (the application of the boon).
Blogging, book-writing, and other social media efforts by Doug, Keith, and Mark represent just some of their individual applications of the "boons" (gifts) that they have discovered through real-world experience and reflection, through engaging in my thinkering biotechnology model.
They're trying to improve the world by shaping health and fitness choice architecture.
But, like Doug reiterates, "Don't take it on blind faith." Instead, take it to the gym and experiment, then iterate.
To good health,
Fantastic post, Brent! An erudite discussion of health and fitness, with a nod to Joseph Campbell and Nassim Taleb - what more could we ask for?
ReplyDeleteDoug's book is a keeper - the best "fitness" book I've ever laid hands on. And this from someone who doesn't follow the prescribed workout protocol. A spate of cognitive dissonance? Nope - the fact of the matter is that my on-going, n=1/m=1 "experiment" has demonstrated that I'm one of the (as Doug puts it so well) "graveyard survivors". This is purely genetic, nothing I can pat myself on the back for. As a result, I can tolerate (and enjoy) a bit more work. However, I still follow the same basic recovery/rebound ideas that Doug explains in BBS. Quite simply, BBS is an excellent book for someone of any ability level. Highly recommended.
I'm currently 1/3 of the way through the book. Excellent read, but I'm struck how at odds the principles advocated are from those of cross-fit, move naturally, and the Primal Blueprint in that the latter all advocate an approach to exercise that emphasizes natural movements such as those Grok would have engaged in in his/her daily activities. BBS, on the other hand, says these holistic, naturalistic movements don't sufficiently tap the fast-twitch muscle fibers to promote optimal muscle, strength, and cardiovascular development and health. Well, it's great to have different myths to use as inspiration for tinkering.
ReplyDeleteBrent,
ReplyDeleteI just got off a late shift in the ER and found your post. Thanks for you kind comments on BBS. I am glad it has contributed to your my thology. I will comment further after some sleep.
@Aaron,
As Kurt Harris, MD has said-we are not trying to perform paleo re-enactment, we should be trying to mimmick the paleolithic hormonal milleu. The same is true of exercise, we are using modern knowledge and technology to activate the active genotype while mitigating against acute and chronic injury.
Doug McGuff
Thanks, Keith, Aaron, and Doug.
ReplyDeleteHere's an analogy: BBS is to exercise as FAGE Total Yogurt is to diet--both are modern science/technology developments/applications in the spirit of ancestral mimicry that support our physiologies by driving beneficial hormonal signaling. Both fit beautifully under the choice architecture definition of Ancestral Fitness that I developed awhile ago.
(That's my best shot at using a SAT analogy, Keith!)
Also, the BBS spirit has helped me diversify the mechanical loads on and resulting reperfusion patterns in my cardiovascular system, which is something that seems important to me (I love cardiovascular physiology, BTW).
Keith is like Gio Carmazzi in that he comes from a genetic power-freak background. I relate more to Mark Sisson in that I come from a genetic endurance-freak background. All of us are hedging our ways toward some personalized hybridization in the name of speed, power, and optimal epigenetic expression, while at the same time protecting ourselves against injury risk (the negative Black Swan mitigation awareness bit).
The Barbell is such a useful cognitive framework to tinker with myths from a falsification/deductivist frame-of-mind. My diligent thinkering with "The Hero of Three Faces" my-thology, which includes lots of proprioceptive work, positioned me nicely for a showcase performance in a high school alumni basketball game yesterday (though I am quite sore today, lol).
Best,
Brent
Brent,
ReplyDeleteGreat post, thanks. Just adding my 2 cents.
-Another great place for the recordings of people doing a BBS style workout is www.bodybyscience.net. Many post there workouts and share thoughts. Good stuff.
-I find it a bit silly to think of the things that are done with barbells and dumb bells(cross fit, etc.) as being more "natural". I see nothing natural about a 45# bar with a diameter the perfect size for a person's grip with a nice fit with plates that rotate when you lift them. They are just a way to have resistance and are not far from a nautilus machine in it's distance from the natural. If you are not running, climbing trees, or swimming, etc then there is little natural about any of it aside from being a good stimulus. I have heard some argue that crossfit, etc don't work, and I think that is silly too. Of course it works as it is relatively high intensity and low volume. The argument is that there are other ways to achieve results with less risk(short term and long term) and higher efficiency.
-I think the natural movements do tap the fast twitch fibers, but do so in a less safe, less efficient way. Sprinting or jumping, for example, tap fast twitch but puts a high load due to the acceleration that runs up the injury risk. Lifting fast with weights accomplishes the same thing with the same risks. Jogging will not, but I think we all know that by now.
I like the closing of the essay. "But, like Doug reiterates, "Don't take it on blind faith." Instead, take it to the gym and experiment, then iterate." This is absolutely true. I was HIGHLY skeptical of slo mo, high intensity methods upon hearing of it. I was a Devany/cross fit style workout guy for a couple of years and bought into the "functional" training theory. As a tinkerer I gave it a try and it was, by far, the toughest workout I ever did. Except for a bit of overdoing it in the beginning, I have had consistent success with the methods, so the self experiment is working well for me. If you are a gym rat and like going to workout 4-6x/wk like I did then be very careful with this. It takes almost no time to get overtrained, at least from my experience. Pay attention to the time under load progress. It is easy to have the experiment fail due to misapplication. If you have a good facility nearby and can afford a trainer I would consider it.
jeff
Thanks, Jeff, for sharing your insights and experiences.
ReplyDeleteThe 'spirit of the BBS law' is what I am thinkering with personally right now.
BBS is_not_about the 'letter of the law', which is another reason why it acts as a great 'choice architecture' map for health decision making.
Self-experimenters understand the "Spirit of the Law" perspective well: m=1/n=1.
Cheers,
Brent
You should include Art DeVaney in your maps. Both Dr McGuff and Mark Sisson both credit Art for much of their science.
ReplyDeleteHe reads your blog and has said so.
Thanks, Jake, for adding back Art DeVany to this conversation melody.
ReplyDeleteIt's just harder to link to Art now that his site is private. I used to link to his work all the time. See the essay I just posted and also poke around my archives.
Best,
Brent